|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Tobacoo Awreness Programme
/ Home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Tobacco Awareness Programmes : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
The school level programmes
:
These programmes are held in selected schools. The method
comprises holding of a one day camp using slide shows, group
songs, group discussions and individual counseling for known
addicts. The school teachers are requested for help in follow
up. The SEARCH team also follows up the students periodically
during the academic session. From August 1997 to March 2007,
3o schools in Gadchiroli district have been covered.
|
2.
The village level programmes :
These programmes are held with the active cooperation of the
Youth clubs, Women's groups, Gram Panchayat and elders in
the village. The method of education comprises slide shows
and discussions. Motivational songs are an integral part of
the programme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
school level tobacco awareness programme: A debate competition as
a method |
|
|
|
|
|
During April to October 2007
the school level awareness programmes adopted the method of debate
competition for school students. The debate was on the resolution
"In the opinion of the house, tobacco and/or alcohol consumption
by human beings is beneficial for them" Being a debate competition,
there had to be speakers "for" and :against" the statement.
This method was tried in 19 schools in three blocks (Chamorshi, Gadchiroli
and Aarmori) of the Gadchiroli district. The idea was to bring out
the notions and perceptions of the students regarding the matter.
Prizes were announced for 3 best speakers. The students speaking "against"
narrated the problems a family faces because of the addiction of the
elders in the family (especially the father). For some of the speakers,
it was an emotional issue as it was a real life personal suffering
for them. In one school a students speaking "for" opined
that tobacco consumption must be OK nay good since the teachers who
were the role models of the students were seen to consume tobacco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This statement not only embarrassed
the teachers but also led to an announcement by the Head Master of
the school that consumption of tobacco by a teacher while on school
campus would attract a fine of Rs 50/-. Perceived utility of tobacco
consumption alleviating problems such as stomach ache or tooth ache
were cited by the students speaking "for". It was argued
that regular use of tobacco to clean teeth provided protection from
infection. In each school, after the debate competition, the team
from SEARCH took up each of the issues raised during the debate and
explained to the students that consumption of tobacco was indeed harmful
and the price paid for perceived (misconceived) benefits was too heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|